لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
14. In the light with the position explained higher than, it is concluded that a civil servant incorporates a fundamental right to become promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be viewed as for no fault of his personal and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the size of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mold the relief to make it ideal into the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified through the decision with the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Section 302 of your Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to act as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application with the death penalty or life imprisonment depends over the specifics of each case, together with any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Offered the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are on the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally audio, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be issue to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion could be deemed, however, we've been distinct in our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, topic to availability of vacancy matter to your approval of your competent authority.
Reasonable grounds can be obtained to the record to attach the petitioner with the commission with the alleged offence. Nevertheless punishment of your alleged offence does not tumble during the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. still figured out Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising outside of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is within the credit from the petitioner as accused, therefore, case in the petitioner falls inside the exception where bail cannot be granted even while in the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, direction has actually been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion with the same is hereby reproduced:
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty with the accused who intentionally murdered the target.
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
Section 302 of the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject to the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani regulation.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability from the matter, but couldn't be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request into the appellate court.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, would be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It includes the execution of the convicted person like a consequence of their crime.
, click here which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling within the same form of case.
13309-B of 2010 to become weak types of evidence as well as the evidentiary value whereof would be witnessed at the time in the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Hence, confirmed custody of your petitioner in jail is not going to serve any useful purpose at this stage.”
This section specifically applies to civil servants who're rendered surplus due to reorganization or abolition of the division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, aren't topic on the provisions with the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the employing organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section 11-A, including the possibility of being posted to another department, would not implement to non-civil servants. Read more